RegisterRegister   Log inLog in 


. The Christian Furry Haven .
|: Enter :| |: free stats :||:FFC Stats :||: FFC News :|
    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
The time now is Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:08 am
All times are UTC + 0
View posts since last visit
View unanswered posts
 Forum index » Serious Discussion » The Soap Box
Rock Music ... Satanic?!!
Moderators: FFC Mods, Razi
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
Page 2 of 4 [51 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Author Message
LavanZev
Giver of Brownies


Joined: 28 Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Location: nixa, missouri
Ok I luv rock, screamo, metal, and all that fun stuff. Really alot of people think electric guitars are satanic and really everything man made could be used or disorted by satanist! If you are listening to rock make shure you read the lyrics and look at there backgrounds. Like there bio and discography. Some good bands to listen to are A Day To Remember, Sleeping Giant, Confide, Underoath, The Devil Wears Prada, and Family Force 5.
If you have questions about there band names or whatever either look at there bio or there discography. OH and also if you want to listen to some good christian metal and screamo check out http://hopecore.com/ .
_________________


PostPosted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 3:39 am
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger    Back to top 
Pounce
*****

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 86
People should remember that Bach and other composers who are played "traditionally" on organs today in churches are "newfangled stuff" compared to christian history too...

Organs are highly technical instruments, compared to electric guitars they only differ in the use of electricity...

Invented long after any person named in the bible shook the dust of this earth of there sandals.

Most likely the first tunes heard at religious gathering in the beginning of christiany was atonal eastern music style, something modern european ears like to compare to tortured cats.

Compared to that rock and heavy metal is old as dirt.

And i am quite positive in that Bach was discussed as heated back in his days regarding the spitritual worthiness of his music.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:13 pm
  View user's profile Send private message    Back to top 
Gyp
Seraphim


Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 886
Location: Ohio
TORTURED CATS WHAT

I'll have to know that the Eastern Orthodox church still uses Byzantine music thank you very much. And it's awesome. So there.

As far as Christian rock goes, I'm all for it. Take what's popular and make it Christian, sure! but keep it outta church! And that goes for Bach too! that dude doesn't belong in church either.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 9:04 pm
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address    Back to top 
Sleet
Loves Canids


Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2326
Location: East Missouri
What do you believe should be in church?
_________________


PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 10:26 pm
  View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger    Back to top 
Gyp
Seraphim


Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 886
Location: Ohio
A capella chant, or polyphony. Basically, those forms of music which form ancient Christian tradition--mostly Byzantine and Gregorian chant, but there are other valid forms too. I'm okay with the organ as an instrument at Mass, and other instruments certain traditions use, but only so long as they're used within their own traditions.

Taking secular styles of music and putting them in church worship I believe only secularizes Christianity, rather than Christianizing secular culture. Rock guitars and drums, etc. at church is a wholesale sellout to our modern society, imho.

In traditional Christianity, music is all about serving the text. The texts come first, usually from the scriptures or very eloquent prayers, and the chant develops around them. In modern music the text is always subject to the music, as far as meter, rhyme, repetition, etc. Nowadays people come up with an awesome guitar riff and they're like "lets put words to it." Also I think most secular and pop styles of music have really shallow lyrics.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 11:40 pm
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address    Back to top 
UGuardian
Seraphim


Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 594
Location: Condo by the railroad tracks, USA
I have to agree; text first, song second. You're not there to have fun and party: you're there to worship Him.

Gyp wrote:
Also I think most secular and pop styles of music have really shallow lyrics.


*snerk*

Considering what I've been listening to lately that's quite the quote to run across. Laughing

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:40 am
  View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website    Back to top 
Sleet
Loves Canids


Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2326
Location: East Missouri
Gyp wrote:
A capella chant, or polyphony. Basically, those forms of music which form ancient Christian tradition--mostly Byzantine and Gregorian chant, but there are other valid forms too. I'm okay with the organ as an instrument at Mass, and other instruments certain traditions use, but only so long as they're used within their own traditions.

Taking secular styles of music and putting them in church worship I believe only secularizes Christianity, rather than Christianizing secular culture. Rock guitars and drums, etc. at church is a wholesale sellout to our modern society, imho.

In traditional Christianity, music is all about serving the text. The texts come first, usually from the scriptures or very eloquent prayers, and the chant develops around them. In modern music the text is always subject to the music, as far as meter, rhyme, repetition, etc. Nowadays people come up with an awesome guitar riff and they're like "lets put words to it." Also I think most secular and pop styles of music have really shallow lyrics.
I mostly agree with that, but much of the hymns, including Bach's, involve adding sacred text, almost or completely word-to-word (translated, at least) to classical styles of music; I think this is fine.

I do agree with the critique of pop music in church, however. It is typically shallower lyric-wise, and if they try to get too spiritual, it clashes with the feel of the music. Really, Christian rock tends to neuter both Christianity and rock. Actually, I'm kind of a hypocrite, because I play bass in my church's band, but our band was pretty sad without me and I didn't want members to be turned off of attending. I think not playing would have caused more bad than good.
_________________


PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:23 am
  View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger    Back to top 
Gyp
Seraphim


Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 886
Location: Ohio
I do really like hymns. I grew up in the good ol' CoC and we sang tons of hymns. They're near and dear to my heart... but they wouldn't be in the right place in, say, my Serbian Orthodox church, because they don't fit in the Serbian tradition. I think it's also important to keep pretty close to Christian tradition... obviously there will be organic change over the years (like going from unison plainchant to three or four part harmonies), but the idea is for that change to be organic, happening steadily and naturally, rather than being forced on the church, like I think rock music was. Hymns are part of the American tradition, however, and I think they're natural and organic enough for American churches... so long as the theology in them is good. (I think "holy, holy, holy" is my favorite hymn)

As for instruments, I'd rather not have any, but that's because I grew up in the CoC and am now in the Orthodox church, and neither group uses instruments. The CoC says instruments in worship are sinful, but I don't agree with them there. However, instruments MUST simply be in the background supporting the music, and not be the main focus. I've been to many churches where the "worship band" is basically on stage having a concert rather than actually leading the church in worship. The best place for a choir to be I think is out of sight, which is why many churches have choir lofts. In my home parish the choir stands in the back of the church behind all the people. If they must be in front for spatial reasons, they should at least be off to the side with the focus being on something else--maybe an icon, a crucifix, an altar...

"Really, Christian rock tends to neuter both Christianity and rock."

I totally agree here. Even outside of worship I can't stand most Christian rock because it usually fails at being both truly Christian and being good rock. Like that one Barlow girl song which is basically a ripoff of Evanescence, but not nearly as good. Undecided it makes me want to listen to Evanescence instead of God.

It's good to make Christian music in popular styles, though. Why shouldn't people who like the popular styles have Christian words to listen to and sing along with? But we have to be careful not to sell out too much to the secular culture around us, and also careful not to put our own personal musical preferences over true worship.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:36 am
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address    Back to top 
Sleet
Loves Canids


Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2326
Location: East Missouri
At the Catholic church I go to at college we have a band (I think I might volunteer to play drums in it, as I heard their current one will not be consistently volunteer), but it is in a little area behind and below where the priests preach, and they never overtake the choir and the congregation. I think it's better than how my home UCC church is, where they put the "songleaders" along with the rest of the band where the pastor traditionally preaches like a concert and then has the pastor preach from in front of us and by the congregation. Added to the fact that our pianist (who is forgoing our nice baby grand piano and organ for a good but unnecessary electric piano) is not well-suited to modern music, I think it's way too heavily forcing modernity. I really think they need to take it "organic," as you put it.
_________________


PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:49 am
  View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger    Back to top 
mrkrystal
Seraphim


Joined: 11 May 2008
Posts: 699
Location: Washington
It's like...
"Hi. It's me, God. Here's a 2000 page book about what I expect from you and what I'm all about. Please try and follow my teachings, k?"

*Applies statistical analysis*
"If only I could decode this book! If I could do that, I could figure out the meaning of life and God's will!"

God: Confused
_________________


Saurian Translator 6.2

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:37 am
  View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website    Back to top 
Pounce
*****

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 86
Gyp wrote:
A capella chant, or polyphony. Basically, those forms of music which form ancient Christian tradition--mostly Byzantine and Gregorian chant, .


I have doubts gregorian chants or byzantine music was known in Israel back then, would have to research or ask someone versed in historical music.

Given timeframe and location of where christianity originated from my guess would be eastern music, like what traditional music in arabic countries is, mostly string instruments.

That is if they played during the first christian gatherings music at all, but that would be pretty hard to find out, there is not much i have seen about details of how things where done back then.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:59 pm
  View user's profile Send private message    Back to top 
Gyp
Seraphim


Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 886
Location: Ohio
Pounce wrote:
I have doubts gregorian chants or byzantine music was known in Israel back then, would have to research or ask someone versed in historical music.

Given timeframe and location of where christianity originated from my guess would be eastern music, like what traditional music in arabic countries is, mostly string instruments.

That is if they played during the first christian gatherings music at all, but that would be pretty hard to find out, there is not much i have seen about details of how things where done back then.


I've studied it a little. The early Christians started with a capella Jewish chant in Hebrew, mostly chanting the psalms. Instruments were actually fairly rare in early Christianity, iirc. Byzantine and Greek chant developed organically out of that Hebrew model of chanting the psalms, and Gregorian chant developed organically out of Greek chant.

So, these forms of chants are not exactly like the Jewish chants the first Christians used, but they were formed off the same principles (i.e. chanting texts directly without doctoring them) in a slow, historical growth process, which is the process I've been advocating.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:02 pm
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address    Back to top 
Pounce
*****

Joined: 19 Dec 2009
Posts: 86
I think it is an matter of time, as soon rock is 300 years old it will be considerd classic.... given it developed from an mixture of african percussion and european folk too... nearly all music is based on two or three older "styles", even techno and rap has its classical roots.

For if i where that type of religious i would probably prefer the chants for churches too, they file for me under contemplary (sp?)

Maybe soft reggae too, it is pretty spiritual, just has its roots more in the african corner.

I hate organs though, the tunes it produces simply raises my fur.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:58 pm
  View user's profile Send private message    Back to top 
Gyp
Seraphim


Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 886
Location: Ohio
yeah, I'm not too fond of organs myself; I think they're generally too loud and to obtrusive. But objectively, I see the good in them. (for example, the pipe organ uses air blown through pipes, and has a "voice" like us, blowing air through our vocal chords, in a way no other kind of instrument does.) I think that they're all right when used in their proper context.

Rock though... well... I'm not sure that kind of music will ever belong in church. Rock is mostly instrumental, first off, and the words definitely serve the music rather than the music serving the words. Often you can't even understand the screaming words of rock songs belted out over the screech of the guitars and bass and drums.

JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZZUS LAMB of GOHDDA *bass solo* Have MERCY (MERCYMERCYMERCY) on UUUUUUUUUUUUUUSSUH *drums solo*

ugh I can't even contemplate it...

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:38 am
  View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address    Back to top 
Sleet
Loves Canids


Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 2326
Location: East Missouri
Worse is the breathy whining, because it takes priority over the instruments, but you can't understand it anyway so it defeats the point. Unnnnnnnngghh, Jesus yeaaaahhh, un-hunh, mmmmmmmjesus lamb of Gaaaawwwwd unnnnnh.
_________________


PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:46 am
  View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger    Back to top 
Display posts from previous:   Sort by:   
Page 2 of 4 [51 Posts]   Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4 Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic View previous topicView next topic
 Forum index » Serious Discussion » The Soap Box
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
[ Time: 0.1389s ][ Queries: 8 (0.0057s) ][ Debug on ]